Thursday, November 24, 2011

Lancelot Link: HAPPY THANKSGIVING!

Lancelot Link Thursday! If you wonder what the President has for dinner on Thanksgiving after he pardons the turkeys, here are some articles about screenwriting and the biz plus some fun stuff that may be of interest to you. Brought to you by that suave and sophisticated secret agent...



Here are five cool links plus this week's food chase...

1) Gee That Movie Poster Looks Familiar!

2) Some People Take Researching Serial Killers To An Extreme!

3) Cool Film Posters From Another Time!

4) Doug Richardson - DIE HARD 2 writer on The Worst Note He Ever Got!

5) 20 Stunts Gone Really Wrong.

Today is THANKSGIVING in the USA, a time when we eat until we explode... much like Mr. Creosote. So - no car chase this week...



Happy Thanksgiving!

- Bill

Thriller CD

BLACK FRIDAY SALE:
*ALL* CLASSIC CLASS CDs

ALL SIX CLASSIC CLASSES!
Why break up a set? Get ALL of the Classic Classes on CD for one low price - and save on postage, too! SIX CDs packed with information!
From IDEAS & CREATIVITY to WRITING INDIES to WRITING HORROR to the 2 part WRITING THRILLERS to GUERRILLA MARKETING. These classes used to sell for $15 - for a total of $120 with postage & handling. Buy the whole set and get 'em for only $50 plus *discounted* postage and handling.
It's the big deal - You SAVE $60!!!! ENDS SOON!
BUY NOW!


bluebook


NEW!

*** YOUR IDEA MACHINE *** - For Kindle!

*** YOUR IDEA MACHINE *** - For Nook!

Expanded version with more ways to find great ideas! Print version is 48 pages, Kindle version is around 155 pages!

Only $2.99 - and no postage!


bluebook


NEW!

*** CREATING STRONG PROTAGONISTS *** - For Kindle!

*** CREATING STRONG PROTAGONISTS *** - For Nook!

Expanded version with more ways to create interesting protagonists! Print version is 48 pages, Kindle version is once again around 155 pages!

Only $2.99 - and no postage!


bluebook

NEW!

*** DIALOGUE SECRETS *** - For Kindle!

*** DIALOGUE SECRETS *** - For Nook!

Expanded version with more ways to create interesting protagonists! Print version is 48 pages, Kindle version is almost *200* pages!
Only $2.99 - and no postage!


NEW CLASSES!


The new CDs are available now!


STRUCTURAL FREAKS! - 80 minute CD packed with information! Ready for the freak show?
William Goldman says "Structure is everything". Do you understand structure? Is your script running out of steam halfway through? Exploring different methods of structuring your screenplay - alternatives to the three act structure like the Navajo Story Circle, Tag Teams, Strange Chronologies, and more. Using examples like INGLORIOUS BASTERDS, RUN, LOLA, RUN and PULP FICTION and THE HANGOVER and TIMECRIMES and CRASH and SLACKERS and other odd storytelling methods. The Structural Freaks Class sells for $15 (plus $5 S&H)


The new CDs are available now!

NOIR & MYSTERY - 80 minute CD packed with information on writing Film Noir and Mystery scripts. Using examples from CHINATOWN to OUT OF THE PAST to DOUBLE INDEMNITY you'll learn how to create stories in this dark, twisted genre. How to plant clues, red herrings, suspects, victims, spider women, fallen heroes, the funhouse mirror world of noir supporting characters... and the origins of Film Noir in literature Noir dialogue and how noir endings are different than any other genre. All of the critical elements necessary to write in this critically popular genre. The Noir & Mystery Class is only $15 (plus $5 S&H).


The new CDs are available now!


THEME & VOICE - Theme is the center of your story - the reason for telling your story. How to find theme with your character and use theme to explore your character. Why theme is the most important element in any screenplay. Theme and nexus. Theme and dialogue. Theme and scenes. Your personal themes and finding your unique voice as a screenwriter. This 80 minute CD is packed with information - THEME & VOICE sells for $15 (plus $5 S&H)

Click here for more information on CLASS CDs!

Monday, November 21, 2011

Carbon Arc Projectors

My first job (other than moving lawns and delivering papers and helping my dad) was at the Century Movie Theater in Pleasant Hill... where I was a doorman, an usher, and acting manager (which required me to run the projectors sometimes).

Back in those days they didn't have digital projectors, they didn't even have those platters that held a whole film... Films were in reels that were 20 minutes or less and had to be changed over from one projector to another seemlessly - you've seen how that works in FIGHT CLUB.

But what FIGHT CLUB didn't have the balls to show you - or the research to mention - is that projectors did not have *bulbs* back then... they used *fire*. There were not light bulbs bright enough to project a movie on a screen that far away, so the only other option is FIRE. A carbon arc. So I had to learn how to run the projectors and replace the carbons (probably once a night for each projector) in case the projectionist got sick or drunk or just didn't show for some reason. The show must go on - and that meant I had to run the projectors. And I did this *many many many* times.

A couple of years later I had a job as manager/projectionist at a little indie cinema and ran the projectors 6 nights a week. Those projectors also used fire and had a changeover about every 17 minutes. Here's how that works...



- Bill

Friday, November 18, 2011

Fridays With Hitchcock: The Trouble With Harry

Though Hitchcock is most closely associated with thrillers, most of his films have humor... and he actually made a romantic comedy and some other non-thriller films, plus this nice little comedy. Don’t expect to laugh out loud at THE TROUBLE WITH HARRY, it’s more of a “smile comedy” - gentle humor. And though it isn’t a romantic comedy, it is a comedy about romance... and a dead guy. The trouble with Harry is that he’s dead. Though I’m sure this comparison will result in angry comments, the film is kind of like WEEKEND AT BERNIES... just not as stupid and a lot more charming. Screenplay by John Michael Hayes who also wrote REAR WINDOW and TO CATCH A THIEF and THE MAN WHO KNEW TOO MUCH remake for Hitchcock... and I believe is still alive and writing. The dialogue in this film *sparkles* - lots of double meanings and clever lines... and all of it low key.



Nutshell: Little Arnie (Jerry Mathers - the Beav) is playing army in the woods when he hears gun shots - three of them - and hits the dirt. When he thinks it’s safe, he approaches, toy gun ready for action, and discovers Harry (Philip Truex) dead. When he runs home to tell his mom, a hunter comes out of the woods, rifle in hand - Captain Wiles (Ed Gwenn - Santa in Miracle On 34the Street). He approaches Harry’s body carefully, sees that he is dead... and realizes it’s his fault. He fired three shots - he hit a can, he hit a sign... and he hit Harry. Before he can hide the body, a freakin’ parade of people walk past... and either don’t notice Harry (they aren’t looking down) or in the case of a homeless guy, sees Harry and Harry’s fancy shoes - and takes them. By the time the Captain goes to drag Harry away, he’s discovered, corpse’s feet in hand, by town spinster Miss Gravely (Mildred Natwick - who played spinsters all of her life) who asks, “What seems to be the trouble, Captain?”

No one in this film reacts to the dead guy as you would expect... and that’s part of the fun. No one is shocked that Harry is dead, they all just see him as an inconvenience. Miss Gravely kicks Harry’s body a few times to make sure he’s dead.

And here’s where the story gets weird... in order to remove Miss Gravely’s attention from the dead guy, the Captain begins flirting with her. It’s awkward - both are past middle aged and single all of their lives. But anything to keep her from thinking about the dead guy. Miss Gravely asks if he’d like to come over for tea and muffins later. Harry is the “love corpse” - bringing couples together in this film!

Our hero is abstract artist Sam Marlowe who has just moved into this small town, and has put his strange paintings up for sale at the general store. He’s fussy about getting them right-side-up, even though they’re just blobs of paint. When he’s out sketching in the woods, he comes across Harry... and sketches him. Then discovers the Captain hiding behind some trees. They discuss the Harry problem... and that’s when little Arnie and his mom Jennifer (Shirley MacLaine in her first film) come to check out Harry... and Jennifer does something strange - she says Harry deserved it, instructs Arnie not to tell anyone about Harry, and the two leave.

Sam helps the Captain bury Harry... which ends up being an amusing scene.

Since Jennifer seems to have known Harry, Sam tells the Captain that he will talk to her and find out whether she’s going to call the police.

Oh, the police in this small town is a part time deputy sheriff named Calvin Wiggs (Royal Dano - one of those character actors who is in every movie ever made). Wiggs gets paid by the arrest - so he’s like a commission cop, out to make a sale. When someone says they heard shots in the woods, he’s going to try to close the deal and arrest someone. He’s in direct contrast to Sam, who is all about art - not money. All of the characters are in contrast to each other in this film. We have an older couple and a young couple, etc.

When Sam slyly interviews Jennifer about Harry, he discovers that Harry was her evil ex-husband... and she clobbered him when he showed up at her doorstep. She’s sure that *she* killed Harry. Of course, the sparks of attraction fly and now Sam wants to cover up Harry’s death to help the woman he’s falling in love with.

And when the Captain goes to eat muffins at Miss Gravely’s house, he finds out why she was so casual about Harry’s dead body earlier - she’s certain that *she* killed Harry. She was taking a walk in the woods and this strange man accosted her, so she hit him repeatedly with her shoe... and he went down, dead.

CAPTAIN
A real handsome man's cup.

MISS GRAVELY
It's been in the family for years.
My father always used it... until he
died.

CAPTAIN
I trust he died peacefully. Slipped
away in the night?

MISS GRAVELY
He was caught in a threshing machine.

Now we have three possible Harry-killers (four if you add little Arnie with his toy gun) and one commission cop looking for the body.

Harry’s body gets dug up and re-buried a bunch of times, and the body is dragged all over town... ending up in Jennifer’s bathtub at one point. Eventually, they solve the Harry Problem and the film is over. The end.

Hitch Appearance: Early in the film, walking down a country road.

Sound Track: This is the very first movie Bernard Herrmann scored for Hitchcock - and it’s a fun, jaunty bit of music that keeps the tone light and frothy while they are discussing what to do with a dead guy.

Great Scenes: One of the great things in this film is the look - beautiful color photography of New England in the fall - everything is red and yellow and orange. It’s like a bunch of the best postcards you’ve ever seen.

Dead Body: Another great thing about HARRY is how Hitchcock finds the perfect framing and angle and composition to make the dead guy *funny*. Shot after shot has you *laughing* at a dead person - which is not exactly normal. The two things going against laughter from a dead body on screen is that is’s a dead body... and the actor is severely limited in delivery and gesture. So finding that one perfect angle that makes the dead body look silly is required... and that takes someone who understands film. There is a shot of the *feet* used at the end of the film (and earlier) that makes a dead guy funny as hell. Every time someone stumbles on Harry we get another funny angle of the dead guy.

Captain’s Rifle: I’ve said before that there is often a fine line between thriller and comedy, and HARRY lives on that line. There’s a great little suspense scene that is *funny* as the Captain, with his rifle, the one that shot Harry, must walk past Deputy Sheriff Wiggs... so he tries hiding it, and isn’t entirely successful. We worry that Wiggs will notice the rifle, but the Captain trying to keep it hidden is funny. Note that this is all about the situation... and the tone used in the film. Change the tone to straight thriller and you have a great little suspense scene as the suspect has to walk past the policeman while carrying the murder gun.

Harry In The Tub: Another comedy- suspense scene has Harry in Jennifer’s bathtub... just as Deputy Sheriff Wiggs shows up! At this point in the story, they’ve spent the whole day burying and digging up Harry, but Miss Gravely has decided to confess to Wiggs that she killed Harry by accident. It was really self defense, Harry accosted her. But Harry is covered with dirt. So they have put him in the tub to clean him up, and are cleaning his clothes (which ends up funny because each has a cleaning method they think works best, which leads to a debate over something trivial in the grand scheme of things)... and that’s when Wiggs shows up. Now they have to keep Wiggs from accidentally opening the door to the bathroom or finding the clothes hastily hidden around the room. All of the cast is here - our older couple, our young couple... and Arnie. And it’s Arnie who comes out of the bathroom, leaving the door open so that we see Harry’s legs hanging over the edge of the tub looking silly, and asks, “What’s Harry doing in our bathtub?” Hitchcock used keeping the dead body hidden from authorities to create suspense in ROPE, but here a similar situation is played for laughs.

Art Trips Up Artist: Wiggs has come to Jennifer’s house because of Sam’s sketch of Dead Harry... which perfectly matches the description of the dead guy the homeless guy says he got his overly fancy shoes from. Just like in a thriller where the protagonist’s life is used against him, here we have an artist’s skill at sketching someone - and making it lifelike (I guess deathlike in this case) is what leads the Deputy Sheriff to Sam - as suspect! Sam is the only person in this whole film who we know didn’t kill Harry. Now Sam must find a way to explain the sketch of the dead guy to Wiggs... and that creates comedy.

The Millionaire & The Secret: While the Harry Problem is going on, down at the General Store, a Millionaire driving by has noticed Sam’s paintings, and returns with an art critic. The Millionaire wants to buy all of the paintings - and will pay millions. But Sam has no use for money, so he makes a deal - everyone gets to make a wish, and the Millionaire will make that wish come true in exchange for the paintings. This is a great piece of cinema magic, because *you* start to think of what you might wish for. All of the wishes are the perfect mix of fantasy and practical - like Jennifer who wants a big delivery of fresh strawberries every week - even when they are out of season. The only wish we do not hear is Sam’s - he whispers to the Millionaire. This creates suspense and mystery for the rest of the film - what did he wish for?

THE TROUBLE WITH HARRY is a magical light comedy about a dead guy who brings couples together... Imagine pitching that logline! With Halloween coming up, it might be a fun film to watch (the fall setting - and it’s about a dead guy), and it’s okay for kids - though I’m not sure the pacing is fast enough for kids.

- Bill

BUY THE DVD AT AMAZON:







Tuesday, November 15, 2011

Scene Of The Week: THE THIRD MAN

The scene of the week is a nice bit of threatening dialogue from THE THIRD MAN, and a reunion between two old friends Holly (Joeseph Cotton) and Harry (Orson Welles)... after one of their funerals. The great thing about this conversation is how charming and fun Harry makes his threats and his justifications for criminal activities. He's a bad guy you just want to hang out with.



The British Film Institute selected THE THIRD MAN as the Best British Film Ever Made - and it's hard to argue with that. It does a million things right, it has one iconic scene after another, some amazing lines (this scene doesn't have the film's best lines!) and is a great thriller with a huge action-chase set piece at the end which has been lifted in dozens of other films. If you haven't seen it - check it out. Actually filmed in the rubble of Post WW2 Vienna!

Comments section is open for discussion of the scene.

- Bill

Friday, November 11, 2011

Fridays With Hitchcock: Topaz (1969)

Screenplay by Samuel Taylor based on the novel by Leon Uris

The worst of Hitchcock's two cold war movies made in the mid-60s, this film was based on a big best selling beach read by Leon Uris - one of those ripped from the headlines things about the secret shenanigans behind the Cuban missile crisis, filled with as much intrigue between the sheets as behind the doors of the embassies... and a cast of thousands. And the major problem with TOPAZ is probably with the source material's scope. Novels are an entirely different medium than screenplays and the movies that come from them. There are many things that you can do in a novel that just don't work in a movie. A movie is viewed all in one gulp and we expect the story needs to flow and the pieces connected to each other. Usually the audience does what I call the “skin jump” where they imagine themselves as the lead character and live the story on screen vicariously. They imagine they are James Bond or Indiana Jones or Neo from THE MATRIX or the character looking for love in a romantic comedy.

A book is a completely different animal – though there are books that you might read in one gulp, for the most part books are read chapter-by-chapter and we put a book marker in and set it aside. We may take days or weeks or even months to read a single book. So the focus is often on the *chapters* rather than the overall story. Even if a chapter ends with a cliff-hanger, it also usually works as a self-contained unit, giving us someplace to put a book mark and set the book aside. Due to the way the story is delivered to us – chapter by chapter – a book can be episodic and doesn't need to be from the protagonist's point of view. Because we can “get into a character's head” it is easier for us to identify with everyone, even the antagonist. We can bounce from character to character without ever being pulled out of the story. So the problem with adapting some novels is that they work so much differently than a movie works that our best set is probably just to toss the book and just run with the concept... or just leave it as a book. Some things are more at home in the medium they were created in.




The big problem with TOPAZ is that there is no lead character - it bounces back and forth between characters - so most of the scenes “star” minor characters that we haven't really gotten to know. The tone also works against it – a “ripped from the headlines” story often plays like a “just the facts” documentary, which means low key drama and less focus on emotions and drama. Combine that tone with no lead character to identify with and we end up with a story that was probably exciting in book form but ends up dull on screen. The screenplay is by Sam Taylor who wrote VERTIGO, but his skill set may not have been able to tame this all- over-the-place novel. The film just isn't very good...



Experiment: A big one! The film actually has four plots - and each is like its own little story. This film paved the way for movies like PULP FICTION. Different lead characters in each story with some overlapping characters who show up in more than one story, and one character who connects all four. It's a great experiment that probably comes directly from the novel's structure – but like most experiments, it fails. But let's look at it anyway, since PULP FICTION shows that it *can* work. Here are the four stories...

In Denmark: A top ranking Russian and his family defect to the USA.
In the USA: While the Cuban delegation is in town, secret documents are photographed that hint at Russian missiles sent to Cuba.
In CUBA: Spies find the Russian missiles.
In FRANCE: A high level spy ring in the French government is exposed.

Wow, that seems almost linear and not nearly as complicated as the movie is.

Anthology films like PULP FICTION contain more than one story, so the whole thing can't be broken up into the traditional three acts because the over-all story is actually a collection of smaller stories. Other anthology films include the horror anthology ASYLUM and the dramatic anthology O. HENRY'S FULL HOUSE, the Neil Simon comedy PLAZA SUITE and Ray Bradbury's weird tales anthology THE ILLUSTRATED MAN, not to mention Stephen King's horror anthology CAT'S EYE.

These are collections of short stories all with a similar genre or writer... but there's something else holding all the pieces together. A thematic structure that connects the stories.


Your anthology is usually going to have some sort of a common theme. A collection of short stories is collected for some reason. If you are a famous writer like Stephen King or Neil Simon, that might be a good enough excuse to lump a bunch of stories onto the same reel of film. Even if you *are* a famous writer, why are these stories all in the same collection and other stories not? In TOPAZ the stories are connected because they are all part of an over-all story in the same way an anthology movie like ASYLUM where the new psychiatrist at a mental institution interviews each of his murdered predecessor's last patients to see if he can figure out which one is the killer. Even though each segment is it's own self-contained story, they are also part of a larger story. In TOPAZ each of the four stories has a beginning and middle and end, but each is also a piece of a larger story. That story doesn't really have a traditional beginning-middle-end... In fact, Hitchcock ended up filming three different endings to TOPAZ and the test audiences hated every single one of them, forcing him to cobble together and ending from the footage on the cutting room floor.

An anthology film may be exploring love after divorce, or people facing their own mortality, or maybe flawed people searching for redemption like PULP FICTION. Each story usually explores the theme, showing different aspects of the theme or different characters struggling with elements of the theme. Basically, you are exploring the theme of redemption or mortality through different stories. One of the problems with TOPAZ is that there is no theme connecting all of the stories, so we just have some minor threads of one story's plot that just happen to connect to the next story's plot – and sometimes those threads aren't very strong.

Remember, the more specific you can be about what your theme is, the deeper you can explore it. If your theme is "love" you won't be digging as deep into the subject as if your theme is "first love" or "the end of love" or "the love of my life" or "second chances at love" or "love hurts" or "love is blind" or... well, love is a vast subject. Figure out what theory about love you want to explore in your stories and then come up with different stories that explore that theory. The PULP FICTION stories are a great example...

The first story with Travolta and Uma - what happens?
The second story with Bruce Willis as the boxer - what happens?
The third story with Travolta and Jackson and Harvey Keitel - what happens?

Now let's look at the wrap around - what is Samuel L. Jackson's life plan?


See how all four deal with issues of redemption? The problem with TOPAZ is the four stories above have no thematic connection... except maybe a character who sends another character to do something dangerous that may result in their death. Um, not as uplifting as a search for redemption. In fact, kind of off-putting. When you add that to the episodic nature of the story and the lack of a protagonist and we end up with something that is really hard to get into and really hard to like.

Okay, now let's take away Sam Jackson and Bruce Willis and John Travolta from PULP FICTION and replace them with unemotional and uncharismatic and mostly unknown actors. When a star plays a role, for good or for bad, their baggage comes with them. Though Travolta and Jackson play *killers* - both are charming guys who usually play roles that we like or admire (or are just bad-asses in the case of Jackson) so we instantly buy into them. We have liked them in past roles, so we like them in PULP FICTION the moment they walk into frame. But when Frederick Stafford (who?) walks into frame, we have no idea who the hell he is and he has to “earn” our identification... and in TOPAZ the characters are each on screen for only a brief time before we are on to the next character. Not enough time to get to know them, let alone like them or care about them or hope they resolve whatever problems we really don't have enough time to learn about.


Nutshell: In the USA segment, an American CIA agent (John Forsythe) wants to bribe the secretary (Donald Randolph) to Castro's right hand man (John Vernon) to steal his papers.... but doesn't want it traced back to the USA, so he goes to his pal in the French espionage pal (Frederick Stafford) who is having problems with his wife (Dany Robin) to get his son-in-law (Claude Jade) to provide a sketch of the secretary so that his agent (the late great Roscoe Lee Brown) whose cover is a florist, can pretend to be a reporter for Ebony Magazine in order to get past security and bribe the secretary so that he can photograph the papers. Oh, and Castro's right hand man has a head of security and the florist has an assistant and the son-in-law is obviously married to the French espionage pal's daughter and... well, there are no shortage of characters in this one segment alone! And the character who does the actual spying stuff is Roscoe Lee Brown - a peripheral character who we will never see again.

That's the big problem with the story - in the Cuba section it's not any of our main characters who sneak onto the military base to photograph the missiles, it's some characters we've never seen before who are only in this once sequence... so when they are in trouble, we don't care. They are disposable characters... and *all* of the characters in this film are disposable - they do their little bit of the story and then we never see them again.

It's like a movie about the extras instead of stars.... and there are no movie stars in the film. Zilch. Hitchcock had paid *half* the budget of his previous film TORN CURTAIN on Newman and Julie Andrews' salaries and that film bombed... so he ditched stars completely for this film, and it suffers because of it. The closest we have to a lead character is the French espionage guy - but he never goes on any dangerous missions himself - he hires someone else. Which means he ends up with soap opera plots - his marriage is in trouble, he's having an affair with an agent, his wife is having an affair with a guy who ends up being a Russian spy, his daughter and son in law have issues... All kinds of silly things that make for a great beach read, but don't work very well on the big screen.

Hitch Appearance: A nurse pushes him through the airport in a wheelchair... then he stands up and walks away.



Great Scenes: Here's where the film really dies - even the worst Hitchcock film usually has a couple of great sequences... but here we get nada. Because the tone is realistic and documentary, there are no real suspense scenes. Let's look at each of the four stories individually...

Denmark: What’s interesting to me about this segment is that it seems to be written for paranoia - but just falls flat. Only a few years later we would get some of the greatest paranoid thrillers of all time - THE PARALLAX VIEW and THREE DAYS OF THE CONDOR and MARATHON MAN - but here the paranoia just never takes hold. Would it be the shift in society after Watergate that sparked the paranoid thrillers that followed? Was this movie just made too soon?


At the Russian Consulate a Guard looks out a peephole, into a mirror - all we see is his face in the mirror... watching. Boris Kusinov, his wife and daughter leave the Consulate... the man in the mirror watching. A moment after they leave, a KGB man exits the Consulate and follows. The Kusinov family walks down the streets of Copenhagen... followed by the KGB man. When the KGB man passes a parked car, the man and woman inside get out and join him - 3 KGB Agents following the Kusinovs.

Because this is shot realistic instead of evocative and emotional, the bit where Kusinov realizes they are being followed and walk between a row of buses *just* as another bus comes to block the KGB Agents falls flat. It seems kind of clever, but there is no suspense at all. The Kusinovs think they have lost the KGB Agents and join a tour group for a china figurine factory. Then the daughter spots one of the KGB Agents... except it’s boring. The daughter splits away from her father and mother, drops a figurine so that she will be taken to the office... and uses a phone to call...

CIA Agent Mike Nordstrom (John Forsythe) - the puppet master of this story. He tells the daughter to be at a department store just before closing and they will help them get rid of the KGB followers. Forsythe is ultra-low key, completely unemotional.


When the department store closes, the Kusinov family leaves and a group of CIA Agents block the KGB Agents. Kusinov and his wife and daughter run to where Mike waits on the street with a car... but the daughter is hit by a bicycle as she is running to the car... goes down screaming in agony and *not moving* while the KGB Agents get past the CIA Agents. Is she an idiot? Probably - but this piece of manufactured suspense doesn’t work at all because Mike just grabs her and helps her to the car. It’s but it's no big deal. A little suspense generated, but it’s over in a blink.

After that they go to the airport, put the Kusinovs on a plane, fly to Washington, DC and take them to a safe house where they are debriefed. Boring on purpose - so that it seems realistic. Kusinov is a KGB Agent himself, and he’s seen many top secret US papers. The CIA boss asks Kusinov if he’s ever heard the word “topaz” used - and Kusinov says it’s a gem stone. Hey, it’s also the title of the movie, so maybe it’s important?

Just then Mike gets a call... from French spy Devereaux (Frederick Stafford - also bland) who asks him to come to dinner. Why would he ask him to dinner? Why is that an important question? But in this movie, an offer of dinner is *exciting*.

Mike and Devereaux have dinner, along with Mrs. Devereaux (Dany Robin). After she excuses herself, Devereaux says that Paris *knows* they have Kusinov - but how did they get the information? You might think this question would drive the rest of the film - but it’s basically forgotten for the middle two stories. So for *half* of this LONG 143 minute film, the whole “topaz” thing (mole in the French Intelligence Bureau) doesn’t even come up. Until the last segment, it’s just this single line - how did Paris find out about Kusinov defecting?

Now, here is the problem with this segment: not exciting, and no real story. Unlike any of the three stories in PULP FICTION, we just have stuff happening. Compare it to THE GOLD WATCH or the last story where they blow the kid’s brains all over the inside of the car and have to call Mr. Wolf for help. Those stories were *stories* and had beginnings and middles and ends. Here we just have this fragment... It was all about the Kusinovs - but we will never see them again!


New York: Devereaux and his wife go to New York on holiday because his daughter and son in law will be in town - son in law is a journalist who is covering the Cuban delegation addressing the United Nations. When they check into their hotel they find Mike waiting for them... Kusinov said that the Cubans have some top secret papers with them about some top secret thing those danged Cubans are doing... could Devereaux find out what those papers say? The son in law has sketches of everyone from the Cuban delegation and they find the sketch of the #1 Cuban Guy’s assistant Uribe - who has been known to take a bribe now and then.

This segment is all about what the Cuban Guy’s secret papers say. Oh, #1 Cuban Guy is played by a bearded John Vernon from POINT BLANK and ANIMAL HOUSE.


Now we have Mike as puppet master pulling Devereaux’s strings... and Devereaux as puppet master pulling the strings of his informant Dubois (Roscoe Lee Brown) who pretends to be a reporter from Ebony Magazine to bribe Uribe to steal the #1 Cuban Guy’s briefcase with the secret papers so that Dubois can photograph them. There’s a suspense scene that doesn’t work at all where Dubois photographs #1 Cuban Guy while Uribe steals the briefcase a few feet away, and then some suspense that doesn’t work where #1 Cuban Guy is looking for a document that may be in the briefcase... while Uribe and Dubois are in a bathroom down the hall taking pictures of the documents. The problem with both of these scenes is that they are shot blandly (to keep the film real looking) and, well, what the hell do we care about Dubois? He’s a puppet of a puppet!


#1 Cuban Guy finally notices his briefcase full of top secret papers missing and grabs #2 Cuban Guy (red beard) and they kick down the bathroom door and see Uribe and Dubois taking pictures of the documents. Dubois jumps out the window, and there is a chase... but it's not very exciting. It’s emotionless action, and part of that might be that we don’t really think of Dubois as anything more than a pawn in the story... that story experiment biting the film in the butt big time. Well, Dubois gets the camera to Devereaux during the chase - and then the rest of the chase doesn’t matter because if they catch Dubois - what does it matter? He’s a pawn, so we don’t care about him... and he doesn’t have anything important on him.

Off screen - Devereaux develops the film, meets with Mike, discovers the Russians are shipping something into Cuba that may be nuclear missiles, and Mike pulls the puppet strings again so that Devereaux will go to Cuba to investigate...

Which brings us to On Screen after all of this happens and Devereaux is having a big soap opera argument with his wife because she thinks he has a mistress in Cuba and wants him to quit his job and pay more attention to her and... well, soap opera stuff. It’s as if someone notice how completely unemotional this film has been and decided to throw in some fake emotions half way through. But who cares?

Cuba: This segment is all about photographing what is on the ship that just arrived from Russia - are they nuclear missiles?


So Mike’s puppet Devereaux goes to Cuba where he *does* have a mistress - Juanita (played by Karin Dor from the James Bond movie YOU ONLY LIVE TWICE). Juanita is *also* the mistress of #1 Cuban Guy! She gets around. She is also the head of the Cuban underground. So Mike has Devereaux have Juanita have her agents the Mendozas (middle aged husband and wife) go to take pictures of the ship. Okay - how much do we care about the Mendozas? They are only in a few minutes of this film, we have no idea who they are other than Juanita’s agents... and we kind of have no idea who Juanita is other than Devereaux’s mistress. We are so far removed from any characters we *might* care about that what happens to the Mendozas doesn’t matter.


Well, due to a bird taking their picnic sandwich (I’m not making that us) the Cuban Army spots the Mendozas and gives chase. A really short chase... and they are captured because the woman is bleeding. Not a big scene. Hitchcock talked about using blood as a trail of “bread crumbs” for bad guys in an interview about another film, but here it’s not really used here. Still a great idea, and I’ve used it (complete with a fake out trail to throw the pursuers off the trail) in a film. Here it seems like more of an excuse for capture - the agents notice the bleeding and slap the cuffs on her.

But the camera and the pictures get back to Devereaux, who leaves Cuba just as #1 Cuban Guy figures out what is going on (thanks to #2 Cuban Guy recognizing Devereaux from New York) and the Mendozas are killed, Juanita is killed, but Devereaux gets away.

The film shows nuclear missiles being unloaded from a ship... and Devereaux’s wife leaves him... and Mike tells him that there is a mole in French Intelligence named Topaz, and would Devereaux go back to Paris to flush him out?

Paris: The last segment is unmasking Topaz. From this description is may seem like these pieces all fit together - but for that whole center section of the film we have completely forgotten about Topaz, and once Topaz is unmasked... there will still be nukes in Cuba. This doesn’t resolve the problem at all.


Devereaux has lunch with French espionage agents (including an impossibly young Philippe Noiret) and when one of the French guys leaves he goes home to... Devereaux’s wife who he is having an affair with! Dunt-dunt-daaaa! And when she leaves she sees Noiret arriving (or maybe it was the other way around) and Devereaux gets his son in law to go to all of the French Intelligence guys as a journalist and say “TOPAZ!” to see if they react... and gets a reaction from Noiret... and the son in law gets captured off screen and escapes off screen and maybe even goes to Disneyland off screen, but shows up after Noiret has been murdered by Topaz and Devereaux’s cheating wife sees the sketch of Noiret and realizes she saw him at her lover’s house and that means the lover is Topaz and that means we can grab our coats and leave the cinema.


There was originally a different ending - a scene where Devereaux and Topaz (who is his wife’s lover) have a duel to the death in a sports arena... but audiences laughed at test screenings and Hitchcock had to change it to an off camera suicide. Actually, there were a couple more ending tries that failed before Hitch was forced to find cutting room floor footage and create the suicide.

Music: Maurice Jarre does an okay score that sounds a lot like his JUDGE ROY BEAN score - so maybe he recycled it.

The best thing in TOPAZ is probably the *seamless* integration of actors into a real Castro speech. It shows the power of editing to make you believe things that never happened. But this sort of trick may make the film seem “real” but doesn’t make it engaging and interesting and involving. We are not pulled into the story.


The whole film is kind of ho-hum and shows the problem with doing experiments in a script and film - most experiments fail. That’s why we call them experiments. Even though some of the experiments in Hitchcock’s films don’t entirely succeed, they usually have a handful of great scenes, or the experiment itself is interesting to watch (like in ROPE). Here we discover the importance of having a protagonist who is involved in the entire story - *the* pivotal character in each segment. He learn this because this experiment fails - four stories with four different protagonists squeezed into a 143 minute film doesn’t give us much time to care about any of these people or get to know them... so they remain chess pieces moved around the board to tell the story. The more you split the focus among different protagonists, the more you split our emotions so that we don’t have time to care.

- Bill

The other Fridays With Hitchcock.

SECRET SALE!









Thursday, November 10, 2011

Lancelot Link: Their First Assignment

Lancelot Link Thursday! If you believe that monkey from RISE OF THE PLANET OF THE APES should get nominated for best actor, here are some articles about screenwriting and the biz plus some fun stuff that may be of interest to you. Brought to you by that suave and sophisticated secret agent...



Here are EIGHT cool links plus this week's car chase...

1) The Brit List - Best Britsh Unproduced Screenplays!

2) Hollywood's Most Overpaid Stars - who isn't worth their pay check?

3) Michael Bay and His Explosions - charts and graphs and data!

4) What if you wrote a novel by taking 6 page chunks of other novels and just changing the names?

5) Uni Chief Ron Meyer on the TOWER HEIST video on demand fiasco.

6) Shane Black On IRON MAN 3

7) Writers who make the most money per word are profiled.

8) The Found Footage Genre.

An this week's car chase features Gary Busey - a guy I've worked with 2 or 3 times...



- Bill

Friday, November 4, 2011

Fridays With Hitchcock: The Lady Vanishes (1938)

Screenplay by the amazing team of Sidney Gilliatt & Frank Launder from a book by Ethel Lina White.

The second to last film of Hitchcock's British period is probably the film that got him to America – though it was one of a string of international hits he directed during this period. Along with THE 39 STEPS it is my favorite of his films from the British Period, because it is witty and fun and has some great suspense sequences and a clever storyline. I think one of the reasons why this film is beloved is that it's a two-fer – it's a great romantic comedy *and* a great thriller, complete with the standard Hitchcock big spectacle end. There's a TAMING OF THE SHREW vibe (the female lead is a spoiled rich girl) and the rom-com scenes *are* the thriller scenes – there's a great, *fun* scene where the couple is battling one the the villains and she kicks the male lead instead of the badguy. That scene is filled with fun, breezy dialogue – and it's an *action scene*! Most of the scenes do double duty – and it's difficult to imagine someone not liking this film. It's just a great time at the cinema. I probably first saw it at the old Telegraph Theater in Berkeley, which was upstairs from a laundromat. They once showed every single Hitchcock film, from silents through PSYCHO, and I was there for every single film. The funny thing was the number of people who only stayed until Hitchcock did his cameo – then they just got up and left! You know, Hitchcock shows up in the first ten minutes of many of his films. In LADY VANISHES he doesn't show up until the end, so those people saw almost the whole movie... and probably loved every minute of it. If you haven't seen it, the film is now public domain and there are many cheap (but good quality) versions out there, as well as a Criterion Edition... and many FREE copies online that you can stream.




Nutshell: Spoiled rich girl Iris Henderson (hottie Margaret Lockwood) and her bridesmaids (Googie Withers and Sally Stewart) are have taken over a hotel for a bachelorette party on skis when an avalanche strands the passengers of a train in the very same hotel. Though many of the passengers are strange Eastern European types, there are a pair of British businessmen named Caldecott (Naunton Wayne) and Charters (Basil Radford) plus a “honeymoon couple” the Todhunters (Cecil Parker and Linden Travers). When a group of dancing elephants keeps Iris awake, she meets her next door neighbor Miss Froy (Dame May Whitty) an elderly nanny. After bribing the hotel manager to throw the upstairs guest out, she meets him: flat broke music and dance historian Gilbert (Michael Redgrave – father of Lynn & Vanessa), a fellow Englander who becomes her nemesis/love interest in the film. Much of the charm of this film comes from his witty dialogue and their relationship.



The next morning when the train boards, Iris gets knocked on the head trying to help Miss Froy with her bags, and when she wakes up after a nap partway through the train journey Miss Froy has vanished and no one in the compartment or on the train remembers seeing her. Is Iris crazy? Did she *imagine* Miss Froy on the train? Or is there a conspiracy around the disappearance of this kindly old woman? With the help of Gilbert (who isn't riding in the coach section... he's riding in the baggage car) they try to solve the mystery of the vanishing lady.

Experiment: Though all but the first act of the story takes place on the train – a confined location – and this film might be seen as the predecessor for films like LIFEBOAT, the fun experiment wasn't Hitchcock's... it was the screenwriters Gilliatt & Laundner's. The witty writing team created these two businessmen, Caldecott and Charters, who are the R2D2 and C3PO of the film – we follow them into the story even though it is not about them, and like those two robots in STAR WARS they become our favorite characters in the film, showing up in scene after scene on the sidelines of the main story. Kind of a Greek Chorus. Though all of the characters in THE LADY VANISHES are witty and fun (even the villain!) these two characters steal the show... So Gilliatt and Launder carried them over into other scripts – and they show up in several films by the pair.




In NIGHT TRAIN TO MUNICH (1940) they are once again on a train... with always hot Margret Lockwood again (playing a different role) in the early days of World War 2. When the Germans invade Czechoslovakia (a great scene of planes turning the daylight sky dark), top scientist Dr. Bombash escapes to England... but his daughter Anna (Lockwood) is captured by the Nazis and sent to a Concentration Camp... where she meets handsome rebellious prisoner Karl (a sometimes shirtless Paul Henreid from CASABLANCA) and they escape together... and fall in love along the way. Once in England, Karl and Anna try to find her father – who has been hidden away by the British government. Once they find him, Karl reveals that he is a Nazi agent who set this whole thing up in order to find Dr. Bombash and kidnap him back to Germany! Now Anna must team up with actor turned spy Gus Bennet (Rex Harrison... yes, Dr. Doolittle as a spy) and they go behind enemy lines into Germany to rescue her father with Bennet pretending to be a Gestapo agent and Anna pretending to be his mistress. But that means they have to convince Karl to release him into Bennet's custody – love triangle complications ensue – and all of them end up on that night train to Munich... along with Caldecott & Charters who are trying to get the hell out of Germany before England enters the war and they end up POWs. The two bickering businessmen end up pretending to be German soldiers and are part of a big action ending on an elevated tram car over a snowy mountain canyon. Caldecott & Charters become action heroes!




In MILLIONS LIKE US (1943) they are soldiers in World War Two – supporting players in a story about British women on the homefront. I got this film because I'm a Caldecott & Charters completest, and really liked it. Gilliatt & Launder not only wrote it, they directed as well. It's a story of three sisters and their widower dad during World War 2, while all the men are off fighting the war. Patricia Roc plays Celia, the middle sister, who ends up working in an aircraft factory while her older sister works as a secretary to a Colonel and the youngest sister stays home with dad... in a practically deserted town. Celia has never been away from home before, and is taken under the wing of a more worldly gal living in the barracks named Jennifer. The story focuses on the women living without men, doing “Rosie the riveter” type work, and constantly having to scramble for the bomb shelter when their plant is attacked by German bombing missions. One of their “duties” is to be bused to the nearby Air Force Base for dances with the young men... and Celia falls in love with a young pilot Fred (Gordon Jackson from one of my favorite films IPCRESS FILE) and the troubles of a wartime relationship... and eventual marriage. This is one tear-jerking movie, with all three sisters falling in love and dealing with various types of heart breaks... and dad back home trying to be needed in time of war when he is really too old to do anything. Caldecott and Charters are soldiers (on a train!) in a scene where people are being sent to fight and probably die.


Gilliatt & Launder created these two great characters and kept putting them in screenplays that were made into films... where they cast the same two actors to play the roles! These characters became so famous they ended up in a film they didn't write (CROOK'S TOUR) and had a TV series in the mid-1980s (played by different actors as Wayne and Radford were dead by then). Today I don't think you could write an original screenplay and reuse the characters in another script, let alone have them played by the same actors. The closest we get to something like this is Michael Keaton playing Ray Nicolette in both OUT OF SIGHT and JACKIE BROWN – both based on novels by Elmore Leonard.

Hitch Appearance: In Victoria Station near the end of the film, dressed in a black overcoat and smoking a cigarette.

Hitch Stock Company: Basil Radford from YOUNG AND INNOCENT and JAMAICA IN, Dame May Whitty from SUSPICION, Cecil Parker from UNDER CAPRICORN, and Mary Claire from THE SKIN GAME and YOUNG AND INNOCENT.

Bird Appearance: There's a bird in a cage in the hotel lobby, and no shortage of doves once they discover the magician's equipment in the freight compartment.

Screenwriting Lessons: There are so many great things about THE LADY VANISHES it's difficult to know what *not* to talk about! So I've picked a handful of things the script does particularly well... and some of you who are fans will complain that I've left other things out. This film is *also* one of the four main examples on my WRITING THRILLERS audio class, and I'm going to try my best *not* to duplicate any information from there. The lessons I've decided to concentrate on are the film's unusual Act One, the great Supporting Cast, the crackling Dialogue (some great rom-com exchanges), and the use of Clues.


Unusual Act One: Probably *because* this story is a mystery at its core, it has an unusual Act One... they don't even get on the train until 25 minutes into the film, and the thing we might call the “inciting incident” - Miss Froy vanishing – doesn't happen until 32 minutes into the film. Usually Act One introduces the conflict, but here we don't get to the conflict until Act Two. So what the heck is Act One? It's a not-so-grand-hotel comedy that sets up all of the suspects, plants some important elements of the thriller plot while you aren't looking; and moves so fast you never notice the plot hasn't kicked in yet.


The film begins with a great overhead shot of the train buried in the avalanche and moves down to the village, to the hotel, and through the window... without a cut! It's a great combination of very detailed and realistic miniature and set – with a dissolve in there somewhere. Hitchcock films always have amazing miniature work, and we'll talk about that in more detail in the YOUNG AND INNOCENT entry (coming soon). Once inside the hotel lobby, the very first thing we see is Miss Froy heading down the stairs to the front desk – the lady who will eventually vanish is in the first shot. When Miss Froy opens the front door to leave, it blows wind into the room and Caldecott and Charters close it... and like R2D2 and C3PO in STAR WARS, we follow them for the first half of Act One. They are our identification characters at this point in the story, and serve to introduce us to the other characters. Act One is based around the hotel, as if there will never be a train in the film.

Caldecott & Charters are sitting in the hotel lobby with a huge group of people when the manager (Emile Boreo) announces that the train will be delayed and anyone who needs a room should register now. This gives us a chance to meet some of our suspects, as Caldecott & Charters end up at the very back of the line at the front desk. The honeymooning couple Mr. & Mrs. Todhunter have a quiet disagreement – he insists on two separate rooms. What's up with that? A little character mystery that becomes an element in the conspiracy later. Before Caldecott and Charters can secure their room, wealthy Iris Henderson and her two bridesmaids blast into the hotel and the manager jumps from behind the desk to help them... leaving C&C standing in line wondering why she is more important than they are. Iris tells the manager to send up some champagne and food... When he returns to the front desk he tells C&C that there are no more hotel rooms, but he can let them sleep in the maid's room.

All of the dialogue in LADY VANISHES is great, and in Act One (the not-so-grand-hotel comedy) much of the humor comes from the language barrier between C&C and the hotel staff. The manager tells them the maid will have to come up and remove her clothing... and that the room has no 'eat. Though, after a great deal of confusion wondering about food in the room, they figure out that the room has no *heat*... they really aren't sure what to expect from the big-boned by attractive maid. Are they sharing a room with her? Will she be naked? They aren't interested in any hanky-panky.



Usually in order to remove confusion it's a good idea to have one character “introduce” the next character in an ensemble script, and this film is a good example. Caldecott & Charters act as an “introduction device” in Act One – as well as being hysterically funny. They climb the stairs to the maid's room, passing the middle aged waiter bringing the champagne and food to Iris and her bridesmaids... and we follow the waiter inside. Um, the scene in that room is something right out of THE HANGOVER! All of the gals are in their underwear, and Iris is standing on a table hanging her wet clothes on a chandelier – and it's like an obstacle course of half-naked women for the old waiter. He is not comfortable – and that's before Iris asks for help to help her down from the table and he has to touch her half naked body with her crotch in his face. While the waiter pours champagne, we find out that Iris is marrying a man she doesn't love, but is wealthy and will provide her with stability. It's *strongly* hinted that she's sowed a pile of wild oats in her past and is ready to settle down. When the waiter leaves the room, he bumps into the maid on her way up to remove her clothing...


The maid speaks no English, and when she comes into the room C&C have no idea what she is there for. When she grabs clothing for a night out, Caldecott explains she can not change in the room... and she smiles and proceeds to strip. C&C face the wall while she changes. There are a bunch of gags in these scenes with hangers and hat boxes and clothing articles. C&C go down to dinner – and find the restaurant PACKED. People are fighting over tables. When they see a couple leaving a table they make a run for it, and end up sitting across from... Miss Froy. Because they all speak English, they have a conversation which is 90% Miss Froy boring them to death with her life's story. Because this scene is from C&C's point of view, it's everything that could possibly go wrong *to them*. So instead of a pleasant conversation with Miss Froy, they get the worst possible conversation... which is funny, but also a great way to disguise an exposition dump from Miss Froy. After they order steaks and baked potatoes the waiter says something they don't understand, and Miss Froy translates – due to the avalanche the restaurant has no food left.


When Miss Froy leaves, we follow her – the baton has been handed off to her character – as she goes upstairs to her room... which is next door to Iris. Iris is in the hallway, saying goodnight to her bridesmaids and says hello to Miss Froy. Now we get to the dancing elephants. Miss Froy hears a guitar player serenading on the street below her window and goes to listen... but suddenly there is a pounding in the room upstairs. Miss Froy steps into the hallway just as Iris does. Iris tells Miss Froy that she will call the manager and get rid of whoever is making all of that noise. The Manager goes upstairs to an attic room where Gilbert is recording the dance moves while three hefty villagers dance. Now we've been introduced to our male lead – each character introducing the next (C&C to Froy, Froy to Iris, Iris to Manager, Manager to Gilbert). After some complications, the manager evicts Gilbert...



But meanwhile we go back to Caldecott & Charters in the maid's room sharing a pair of pajamas (Caldecott wears the bottoms) and the bed and that old newspaper... as the maid enters. Charter's cover's Caldecott's naked chest from her view. She grabs her nightgown, and when she leaves Charters gets up to lock the door... when she enters to grab something from her dresser. Charters is undressed from the waist down and this gets milked for humor.

When the maid leaves, closing the door behind her...

Iris' room door opens and Gilbert enters, with his luggage. Iris is in bed, in her negligee, and we get the beginning of our rom-com story (about 20 minutes in). Some great dialogue here as Gilbert asks which side of the bed she wants – because he no longer has a bed for the night, he's *forced* to share hers. He unpacks some clothes, puts his toothbrush in the bathroom, runs a bath, starts to strip! This is the perfect rom-com couple – she's rich and beautiful and used to getting what she wants... and smart. He's a poor professor who is easy-come easy-go... and smart. All of the external, society things are at odds with each other, but underneath they have a lot in common. This is their “meet cute” and it is filled with sexual innuendo and some outright sexual comments. Margaret Lockwood is hot and sexy and smart – and in her negligee. He crawls over her in bed to get to the other side. The attraction is there – but both are pushing it away, because each is what the other *hates*. There's some great banter here, and even though a couple of the funny lines miss their mark, there are so many amusing lines that it really doesn't matter. From the other side of the closed bathroom door (naked?) Gilbert tells her that if she calls the manager to complain, he will tell *everyone* that she invited him into her room for the night... but if she tells the manager to give him his old room back he'll have a place to spend the night... other than her bed. Iris grabs the phone.


Next door, Miss Froy can now hear the man serenading below her window again, and hums along with the tune. What she doesn't know is the reason the music ends is that someone *kills* the man serenading. WTF? Hey, we're in a thriller! The next morning, as Caldecott and Charters are boarding the train, Miss Froy drops her glasses as she goes to get her bag and Iris picks them up to return them... but after giving them to Miss Froy someone *purposely* drops a planter from an upstairs window and it hits Iris in the head. Later we realize it was intended for Miss Froy – but we are definitely in thriller territory as a woozy Iris boards the train and says goodbye to her bridesmaids. As the train leaves the station, she passes out...

Supporting Cast: Iris comes to in a compartment with Miss Froy sitting across from her and most of the rest of our supporting cast in the other seats. We have the regal Baroness (Mary Clare) – who is a minister of culture for whatever country she is from. Senor Doppo (Phillip Leaver) and his wife (Zelma Vas Dais) and their little boy. We will later learn that Doppo is a magician whose famous trick is The Vanishing Lady. Because each of these characters is a potential suspect, they are fleshed out and distinctive.


The Baroness Atona is aloof and keeps to herself – but *doesn't* interact with others to such an extreme that we can feel how remote she is. This is an interesting character because it's what she *doesn't do* that defines her – while the little boy is cute and playful and Iris and Miss Froy watch him, the Baroness looks out the train window. Later, when she is questioned, it takes her a moment to turn away from the window and respond. She is above everything that happens in that train car.


Senor Doppo is one of the great minimal dialogue characterizations on film – he's got wild, expressive eyes and theatrical gestures and a massive smile. He always seems like he's having fun. Early on we see him doing a magic trick for his son (making something disappear!) and he looks as amazed as his child that the object has vanished. Throughout the film, Doppo has very little dialogue but manages to light up the screen whenever he's on – a flourish-wave and big smile are a threat in a later scene. This character may turn out to be one of the bad guys, but he doesn't let that stop him from smiling and having a great time in every scene that he's in. Characters like this are one of the reason this film is a favorite – he is *not* a traditional villain at all – you really like him and want to see him in more scenes... even if that means our heroes may get hit on the head a few more times.

Senora Doppo and the boy are almost symbolic of wholesome family – and their apparent honesty is the most lethal weapon in the film. Again – instead of the cliché, the characters in this film take characters who are up to no good and makes them wonderful people we wouldn't mind spending more time with. This makes it difficult for us to figure out who to trust – and who might be in on the conspiracy.


When Iris wakes up, Miss Froy says she looks like she could use a cup of tea, and helps her into the dining car... in the hallway Iris falls against Miss Froy pushing her through an open door into Mr. & Mrs. Todhunter's compartment, and when they slam the door and pull the shades Miss Froy says that honeymooning couples can be so shy. We eventually find out this is married couple are married to other people – having a *six week* affair/vacation while their spouses are back in England not suspecting a thing. Cecil Parker does such a great job of playing a manipulative stuffy prick that you hate him even before you find out he's a lawyer... and has no plan to divorce his wife and marry Linden Travers... he just told her that to get her into bed. The great thing about this character is that he has a logical story trajectory that plays through until the end. He's like Ellis (Hart Bochner) in DIE HARD – that guy who thinks because he's controlled everyone around him he can also control the bad guys... not realizing that he's completely out-matched.


Linden Travers has a great role as “Mrs” Todhunter – the bad girl who has been used and is about to be tossed aside and finds a way to get redemption *and* revenge in the same act! Though this is a subplot – and their reason for not wanting to get into any police inquiry about a missing woman, these scenes are incredibly well written and acted – and Travers' ability to show a brave face while we can see her crumbling within is amazing acting. This is a character who should *not* be sympathetic, but the script takes you inside her character and shows the scenes from her side – as she tries to out maneuver Todhunter's manipulations. He ends up bouncing her back and forth and she ends up emotionally battered every time she does the right thing. This is a Gloria Grahame type role, and she plays the hell out of it – giving you a strong impression in a handful of scenes.

The dining car is empty except for... Caldecott and Charters – our old friends! They are sitting at a table, discussing sports, and using all of the sugar cubes as little players as Charters tries to explain a play to Caldecott. One of the two waiters comes over, and Miss Froy pulls a box of tea and tells another of her endless stories – this one about how her elderly father and mother drink this tea every day, as do a million Mexicans. There's also a signature scene here where Iris asks Miss Froy her name, and the train whistle blows at the same time... so she writes her name in the dust on the window. Though we'll get to the clues in a moment, when you are writing a mystery based script it's important to make the clues *visual* and not call attention to them. When Miss Froy writes her name in the dusty window it is so natural that we never think it's going to come back later. Once the tea is served Miss Froy needs the sugar – and this ruins Charters' sports story... ruining his day *again*.

When they return to the compartment, the gentle rocking of the train puts Iris to sleep... and when she wakes up, Miss Froy is gone. She asks the other passengers in the compartment where the English Lady went, and they look at her like she's crazy – what English Lady? You were alone. The more insistent Iris is that there *was* and English Lady, the more they give her the funny looks and tell her she was mistaken, she came back from the dining car alone.

We are now 32 minutes into the film and the conflict has kicked in.


Iris goes to look for Miss Froy, stopping to ask the Waiter in the dining car if he has seen her. He has no idea who the heck she is talking about. She says: she gave you special tea – Harriman's Herbal. The Waiter says they serve their own tea, no special tea was made for anyone. They check the bill – Tea For One. Though the Waiters are bit players in the back of the scenes (except for this one) they still manage to have *characters*. The main Waiter has a perpetual snear and you aren't sure if he's up to no good... or is just pissed off at all of these pushy people he has to wait on. Why is Iris bothering him with this crazy story about an old woman and special tea? He has better things to do!

When you are writing a mystery, or any screenplay for that matter, you want to make sure the supporting characters are well drawn and memorable. Pat Duncan (COURAGE UNDER FIRE) once told me that the less time a character is on screen, the more vividly they need to be drawn... or they just become part of the scenery. In a story like this where some of these people may (or may not) be part of a conspiracy, they need to be memorable and fully formed even if they are only in a couple of scenes. We need to *know* these people, so that we can wonder if they are part of the conspiracy... or just people on a train. The mistake you might make in a mystery type screenplay is to create well drawn characters who are *guilty* but make the characters who will later be innocent sketchy and underdeveloped. Um, dead give away! One of the mistakes on my crappy film CROOKED is they *cut* the scenes with the innocent suspects (hey, why do we need scenes with these guys?) and then cast Gary Busey as the secret villain and cast *nobodies* in the other suspect roles. No secret there. They also changed everything else on that script including the *concept* - imagine THE LADY VANISHES without a lady who vanishes! So make sure even the innocent suspects are fleshed out and have real characters, some form of character arc or emotional conflict, and a subplot story in the background of the main story so they aren't just props.

Most of the supporting characters are also partially defined by their relationships, which helps with the rom-com aspects. Senor Doppo and his wife, Miss Froy who has never been married, the Todhunter “honeymoon couple”, the two long time bachelors Caldecott & Charters, Iris is going home to be married, and there's a Nun who comes into a film a little later. We'll look at her character and the Doctor who specializes in brain surgery in a moment...

Iris searches the whole train for Miss Froy, ending up in a baggage car at the end... which is filled with colorful singing and dancing hobo-types (poor villagers)... and her nemesis/romantic interest Gilbert. He says if he had known she was going to be on this train he would have stayed another week at the hotel. He hasn't seen Miss Froy and doesn't know who she is talking about...


Dialogue: One of the great things about this film is the clever dialogue. I can never understand why some people want boring realistic dialogue when you can have fun people saying fun things – imagine a comedy film filled with all of the “funny” things your co-workers say... would you really pay to see that? Part of what makes a film entertaining is crackling dialogue, and LADY VANISHES gives every character some juicy lines. Our male lead, Gilbert, has some great lines – smart ass responses to what everyone says. Hey, maybe this film is a *three-fer* because it works as a clever comedy in addition to a thriller and a rom-com.

Iris tries to get the heck away from Gilbert, but feels woozy and almost collapses. Gilbert comes to her aid and asks “What's the trouble?” “If you must know, something fell on my head.” “When? Infancy?” Iris is the straight man for Gilbert's banter – and he has a zinger for everything. “Can I help?” “Only by going away.” “Oh, no. My father taught me never to desert a lady in trouble... he even carried that as far as marrying mother.” So at 35 minutes in, the two team up to find Miss Froy – the train has not stopped, she must still be here somewhere.


In the hallway they see Senor Doppa talking to a distinguished gentleman, the brilliant brain surgeon Dr Egan Hartz (Paul Lukas) - Gilbert is impressed. “You flew over to England the other day and operated on one of our cabinet ministers.” “Yes.” “Tell me, did you find anything?” “A slight cerebral contusion.” “Well, that's better than nothing.” Dr. Hartz says he's picking up another case at the next station and accompany them to the hospital where he will operate.

You would never know that Dr. Hartz is the villain in this film – he's charming and witty and distinguished. If Gilbert wasn't the romantic lead, he could easily fit the bill (except he's a bit old) – he seems like he just stepped out of a country club cocktail party... somewhere in Prague. Lukas was a Hungarian actor who would win the Oscar for Best Male Actor for WATCH ON THE RHINE in 1943. His character is sympathetic to Iris, and wants to help – but also mentions that a knock on the head can create disillusion. It's not that he doesn't believe Iris about Miss Froy, but that Iris may have imagined Miss Froy based on meeting her at the hotel... and Miss Froy was never actually on the train. Iris got knocked on the head, basically *dreamed* having tea with Miss Froy, and woke up in the compartment. The great thing about this character is that he's nice and polite and trying to be helpful... and what he says makes sense. Iris doesn't want to believe she *imagined* Miss Froy on the train, but it's possible.

When Gilbert questions the passengers in the compartment, they haven't seen her. When Dr. Hartz asks Iris what she looked like, she says that it's hard to describe her – she was a middle aged woman in oatmeal colored tweeds... and gives an amazingly detailed description, to which Gilbert quips that she must not have been paying attention. But the problem is, Miss Froy's description is kind of a generic middle aged woman wearing what generic middle aged women wear.


Dr. Hart offers to help Iris and Gilbert find her, but when they question Mr. Todhunter he says he has no idea who she is talking about. The reason why? Well, he doesn't want to get mixed up in any missing persons police business that might reveal his affair. Iris argues with him, but Mr. Todhunter doesn't back down, and Iris says *loudly* that she'll find Miss Froy if she has to stop the train to do it. This is overheard by Charters standing outside the restroom – Caldecott inside – knocks and enters and tells Caldecott that Iris is looking for Miss Froy. “Well, she's not in here.” The two realize if Iris stops the train they will miss seeing the big game, and decide to claim they never saw Miss Froy. Again, a character-related reason to deny Miss Froy's existence – which makes Iris look crazy. Dr. Hartz believes it's all an hallucination, thinks this is “Most interesting!” (his catch phrase) and excuses himself because they are about to stop at the station where he will pick up his patient.

Since this is the first time the train has stopped, Iris and Gilbert each take a side of the train to look for someone trying to smuggle Miss Froy off... but no one gets off the train. Instead only Dr. Hartz's patient (head wrapped in bandages, on a gurney from an ambulance, with a Nun/nurse in attendance) boards the train.


Though there is one more character who plays a pivotal role in the story (a woman dressed *exactly* as Iris described, but *not* Miss Froy), the Nun is the last important supporting character in the story. She is a deaf-mute – making communication impossible. But she also could not have seen Miss Froy, since she boarded the train *after* Miss Froy vanished. Later we will discover that the Nun is half-English/half-Eastern European – and this character has to make some tough decisions. She's what I call a *Pivot Character* - someone who starts out on one side and slowly changes to the other side. I've got a new chapter in the Action Book revision about this type of character – people like Tommy Lee Jones' Lt. Gerard in THE FUGITIVE. There are good guys who give in to the dark side and bad guys who see a chance for redemption. And the Nun is the latter – she is part of the conspiracy but slowly comes to realize she's on the wrong side and not only *helps* Iris and Gilbert, she eventually does what all bad guys who do good things (but still have an evil past) does – sacrifices herself so that others can live. Because of this change, the Nun is an interesting character with real depth. All of the supporting cast in LADY VANISHES are really well written.

There's a great dialogue exchange between the Todhunters where each tries to outsmart the other and gain the upper hand in their relationship – and the twists and turns in the conversation are amazing, and the wordplay is clever. “Have you taken leave of your senses?” “On the contrary, I've come to them.” These are two intelligent people battling each other with words – and these words are sharper than any sword and maybe just as deadly. A pair of supporting characters who get dialogue fit for a lead.

Clues: Now that Iris has been convinced that there was no Miss Froy, clues begin popping up that hint that maybe there *was* a Miss Froy. The great thing is that a bunch of clues have been planted already, and you didn't notice any of them! Remember Miss Froy writing her name on the dusty window? At the time there was a very good reason for that – the loud train whistle prevented Iris from hearing Miss Froy when she gave her name. You never suspected it was a clue, or that it would ever pop up again. It's was just a *visual* way for Miss Froy to relate information. Well, Gilbert and Iris are seated for lunch at the same table... but Gilbert lowers the window and we see the writing sink below their field of vision! This creates some great suspense, because *we* can see Miss Froy's name written in the dust but they don't notice it. We want to yell at the screen that the proof that Miss Froy exists is right there!


But they are engaged in a great conversation – because part of this story is a rom-com, and they are opposites (that attract) we get their first real conversation. Each lets their guard down and they reveal their true selves to each other. Iris is going home to get married to a man she doesn't love, but is dependable and financially secure. Gilbert is flat broke – when his parents died they left him straddled with their debts, and that is getting in the way of his dreams (his book on historical folk dance). Both are faced with unappealing futures – their common ground. And they genuinely enjoy each other's company. This is the key scene for the romantic subplot – after this scene, even though they each still have the same future (she's still going to get married) but they (quietly) acknowledge their attraction to each other. They end the scene as friends. All of this going on while that danged clue is right there on the window behind them! And just when Iris spots the writing on the window, they go into a tunnel and the smoke from the train engine obscures the writing forever.


In my Mystery & Noir Class, I explain many ways that clues can work in mysteries so that they are “invisible” the first time the audience sees them. The method used in LADY VANISHES is to give the clue a reason to be part of the story *before* it becomes a clue. Remember when Iris returned Miss Froy's glasses to her at the train station? Those glasses come into play later in the story when Gilbert finds them on the floor of a baggage car... and even then they don't seem to be a clue. He's fooling around, trying to cheer Iris up by doing impersonations using the things sitting around the baggage car as props. There's a Sherlock Holmes style deerstalker hat, there's a graduation cap, there's a pipe, there's a pair of glasses – he does an impersonation of a famous person with each prop... But when he gets to the glasses, Iris recognizes them as Miss Froy's. So she was *here* and she lost them in a struggle!


Remember Harriman's Herbal Tea? You thought that clue was finished when the Waiter said they did not serve her any special tea in that earlier scene. But later in the film Gilbert is standing by a window when the cook throws out the garbage... and a tea package sticks to the window – Harriman's Herbal Tea! This is actually the moment where Gilbert completely believes Iris – believes that Miss Froy exists, was on the train, was kidnapped (or worse), and there is a conspiracy involved to make Iris look crazy by denying that Miss Froy ever existed. The great thing about this clue is that the moment we see it, *we* know that Iris wasn't imagining things... without any clunky exposition. It's *visual* storytelling.

They realize the one person who can help them is Dr. Hartz, and go to his compartment, open the door, but only the Nun is there caring for the sick patient. Then Iris notices something odd - the Nun seems to be wearing high-heels. Is that allowed? Maybe she's not a nun after all? This leads them to wonder who is really under all of those bandages in Dr. Hartz's compartment? They go in and start to unravel the bandages when Dr. Hartz returns – busted! Hartz tells them this patient has no face – just raw flesh! That removing the bandages would *kill the patient*. And Gilbert and Iris realize they've gone too far and leave the compartment... But a Nun with high heels?

Okay, the biggest clue of all: Remember that guy serenading under Miss Froy's window who was murdered? Probably not – that was a long time ago. Well, he wasn't killed because he was singing off key or singing while people were trying to sleep – he was killed for the same reason Miss Froy was kidnapped (and will eventually be killed unless they can find her). That tune he was playing, the tune that Miss Froy hums in the train car while Iris is drifting to sleep? That is really a secret code and Miss Froy is a spy and Dr. Hartz is an evil villain and war is going to break out unless Miss Froy can get that code back to England! The tune is the MacGuffin! You just thought it was catchy as hell and kind of exotic. But it's actually what the whole film is about – a musical code.


And that's where you realize that Gilbert is an expert in traditional dance and music and that very first scene of his where he is playing a clarinet and taking notes on the overweight villagers dancing around his room was a set up for this pay off – eventually they will find Miss Froy who will hum the tune for him and he must memorize it... during one of those huge Hitchcock set pieces – in this case, a huge shoot out on the train between bad guy military types lead by Dr. Hartz and the passengers (our supporting cast). Caldecott and Charters are crack shots – they were in World War 1 – and trade quips while trading shots with the bad guys. All of the supporting characters fulfill their “story destiny” as Todhunter tries to manipulate and deal with the bad guys (like Ellis in DIE HARD), but first Mrs. Todhunter turns the tables on him and shows how tough she really is, the Nun risks her life to do the right thing, etc. Whether it's an arc or just a decision – each of the supporting characters is an important part of that big end scene... where Miss Froy is shot at while running from the train and falls down *hard* - probably dead. Now it's up to Gilbert to remember the tune in order to save the world!




Sound Track: That tune was written by Louis Levy, who does a great job of scoring the film. It's a little “big” at times, but not too obtrusive... never reaching Full Korngold status. Levy also wrote the music for THE 39 STEPS (another catchy tune that figures into the story), the original MAN WHO KNEW TOO MUCH, SABOTAGE, THE SECRET AGENT... plus NIGHT TRAIN TO MUNICH and MILLIONS LIKE US. This guy composed the music for almost every British film you can think of pre-1958!


THE LADY VANISHES is a fun film that holds up pretty well today due to its humor, zippy pace, and sexual situations (PG, but lots of lingerie)... and because it's public domain, you can easily find a free copy online or a cheap DVD version. Check it out!

- Bill

The other Fridays With Hitchcock.


BUY THE DVD AT AMAZON: